As registered dental hygienists, how often do you describe your patients’ home care as ‘fair’ or even “poor” at every recall in your notes? You describe the oral hygiene instructions provided, detail the items recommended to help your patients improve at home, carefully select the items in their “goodie bag” to get them started on the right foot, and hope that at least some of it sticks when they get home… only to have them come back at each recall with no changes.
Most dental practices measure patient compliance using metrics such as recall rates, fluoride acceptance, and treatment plan adherence. This data is valuable, of course, but it’s missing the most significant piece of the puzzle: people. To truly impact patient oral health outcomes, it is essential to consider the factors that drive patient behavior, including their beliefs, trust, emotions, and identity.
When Data Falls Short
Jim arrives for his four-month periodontal maintenance appointment, greeted by the same hygienist who has cared for him for years.
His chart reads like so many others; type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, a half-pack-a-day habit he’s “meaning to quit.” His X-rays and probing reveal familiar patterns: deepening pockets, interproximal calculus, and a slow but steady progression of disease.
The hygienist explains, once again, how gum health connects to his heart and blood sugar. The hygienist shows him the X-rays and periodontal chart, explaining the disease progression they show. Jim nods, appreciative but unconvinced. He promises to “try harder,” collects his goodie bag of proxy brushes and toothpaste, and walks out with every intention of doing better, someday.
Four months later, he’s back. The habits haven’t changed, but something else has; his teeth now feel loose. The numbers and notes in his chart indicate a decline, as well as his hygienist’s efforts to educate and empower him; however, they don’t capture what’s happening beneath the surface.
Psychology of “Noncompliance”
Cognitive dissonance refers to the discomfort people feel when actions and beliefs conflict. Jim understands that his smoking habit and poor oral hygiene worsen his periodontal condition and make it harder to maintain his blood glucose levels and heart health. He rationalizes these behaviors to ease his discomfort by maintaining his “good enough” routine of brushing once a day before bed. While the relief is short-lived, it perpetuates long-term harm. Recognizing cognitive dissonance is key in patient education. Shift from a persuasive “you need to…” conversation to a more empathetic approach can be the start of true behavioral change.
“It sounds like this habit has been hard to change. What makes it feel difficult right now?”
Remember the Health Belief Model from your initial education? It’s something dental professionals, alongside many other healthcare professionals, are taught, but it often gets overshadowed in clinical practice. To refresh, people act when they believe they are personally at risk, the benefits outweigh the costs, and they have the confidence they can change.
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Jim knows gum disease is bad, but the long-term risks are abstract compared to the immediate barriers of time investment, discomfort, or even costs. In his mind, he doesn’t have the time to floss and brush twice a day, or he thinks he lacks the dexterity to floss correctly, or he doesn’t want to add to his regular oral hygiene costs. Reframing patient education to benefit focused communication, such as “This will help keep your teeth stable for years to come…” can tilt the internal balance towards the desired behaviors that will improve his oral and systemic health.
Social Proof is another powerful tool in the clinician’s toolbelt. People model behavior they see and emotionally connect with, not just information they receive. This means that patients will connect with and respond to stories more predictably than they do to statistics alone. If a patient hears an oral hygiene success story from a friend, family, or even their hygienist, it feels more personal and less like a lecture.
“I started using an electric toothbrush last year because I felt like I wasn’t brushing well enough, and it made such a difference!”
Telling Jim, “I hate flossing, but I love my water flosser!” can resonate personally with him, improving his connection to the information being shared and strengthening his sense of self-efficacy to take action about his poor oral hygiene.
The People Behind Data
We know we treat people, not just their mouths. However, in the modern dental practice, it can be easy to lose sight of individuals like Jim behind the hundreds of tools and innovations used today to track, map, and analyze practice performance. Numbers reveal trends, but they don’t give you the “why”, the lived experiences, beliefs, and relationships that drive patient behavior far more effectively than any patient education a provider can dish out. These invisible factors and barriers often determine whether health advice and patient education translate into health-promoting actions.
Trust is the Currency of Compliance
It might sound obvious, but when patients believe their provider genuinely cares and will be there for them over time, they’re more likely to act on recommendations. Continuity fosters familiarity, and familiarity in turn builds confidence. Patients who have experienced judgment, financial strains, or dismissal from healthcare providers benefit when care is delivered consistently and empathetically.
Patients like Jim need more than instruction; he needs to feel like his hygienist is on his side, rooting for him, not just documenting his failures every four months. Research across multiple industries and specialties consistently shows that relational continuity increases preventive service uptake and adherence. In dentistry, that can mean the difference between “I’ll try” and “I’ll do it”.
Across Cultures and Socioeconomic Statuses
If you haven’t figured it out yet, compliance is deeply contextual. Socioeconomic pressures, such as working multiple jobs, transportation challenges, and a lack of childcare, can make health feel secondary. Oral health can often be overlooked, even when patients value it. In many cases, “noncompliance” starts before the patient even arrives at the dental office. Systemic communication gaps, such as confusing insurance portals, inconsistent provider lists, or long hold times with providers and insurance companies, exacerbate these contextual barriers.
Cultural factors also shape trust, communication style, and perceptions of authority. In some communities, health is deeply personal and therefore uncomfortable to discuss, even with healthcare providers. In other cultures, patients may defer to providers without voicing confusion or asking questions. Navigating cultural differences and boundaries requires that practitioners have cultural humility, or a mindset that says, “I may not know your barriers yet, but I’m here to learn them.”
Perceived Clinician Empathy
Empathy isn’t a soft skill you add to your resume; it is a measurable determinant of outcomes. Studies have linked patient-perceived empathy with higher adherence, lower healthcare anxiety, and greater patient satisfaction. In dentistry, where encounters are often brief and procedure-focused, empathy can get overshadowed by efficiency. Simple verbal shifts can transform the tone of care provided to be more empathic and patient-centered. Using affirming language, “you’ve already made progress by coming in today”, and reflective listening, “It sounds like mornings are tough for you…” sound more empathetic. Empathy communicates respect, which restores patients’ sense of agency. When patients feel seen rather than scolded, compliance becomes collaboration.
Lastly, Information Overload and Decision Fatigue can occur when even the most well-intentioned patient education gets overwhelming.
Jim had a lot of stuff going on with his systemic and oral health. Patients like Jim, who receive a barrage of information about bacteria, bone loss, systemic relationships, and home care, may eventually just start tuning out the clinician just from sheer fatigue. Decision fatigue is a common phenomenon in healthcare, leading to the postponement of treatment and the avoidance of behavioral change.
Instead of layering patient education, clinicians should focus on one, over-encompassing message, framed around what matters most to the patient. In Jim’s case, “This will help stabilize your teeth so you can keep enjoying those ribeyes” would be far more effective than ten technical explanations of his condition and home care faults. Clear and concise communication encourages patient motivation to make better health choices.
Takeaways
Noncompliance is rarely about defiance or disregard.
It’s about competing motivations, such as fear, fatigue, financial strains, mistrust, or even simple habit inertia, each quietly adding its weight to counterbalance even the best of intentions. When a patient doesn’t follow through, they’re not rejecting the practitioner’s expertise; they are simply choosing the emotionally safe path of least resistance in the moment.
For clinicians, this shift in perspective changes everything. The goal is never to “correct behavior” through repetition or spilling of data points, but rather to understand the barriers that data simply cannot account for, the invisible barriers. Every chart note that describes home care as “fair” or “poor”, or a patient as “noncompliant”, hides a potential story.
The goal is never to “correct behavior” through repetition or spilling of data points, but rather to understand the barriers.
Empathy, curiosity, and language are tools equally essential to patient care as any other tool used in clinical practice, and just as powerful in maintaining oral healthcare as ultrasonic scalers. When we pause to ask why a patient hesitates to change behavior, rather than documenting that they did not change behavior, we move from compliance-based care to collaborative care. That shift reframes the encounter: from instructive to invitational, from “You need to floss” to “Let’s talk about what’s getting in the way.”
Ultimately, data may predict and document decline or noncompliance, but understanding prevents it from happening. Real progress happens not in the metrics of compliance, but in the moments of connection, when a patient finally feels heard, respected, and capable of change. When we treat these qualitative factors as diagnostic clues rather than afterthoughts, we move closer to truly preventive care.
References
Alyafei A, Easton-Carr R.(2024)The Health Belief Model of Behavior Change.StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606120/
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Ananeh-Firempong, O., 2nd (2003). Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 118(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/118.4.293
Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Maxwell, K., Markham, F., Wender, R., & Gonnella, J. S. (2010). Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction with physician, interpersonal trust, and compliance. International Journal of Medical Education, 1, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4d00.b701
Mercer, S. W., & Reynolds, W. J. (2002). Empathy and quality of care. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 52 Suppl(Suppl), S9–S12.
Northridge, M. E., Kumar, A., & Kaur, R. (2020). Disparities in Access to Oral Health Care. Annual review of public health, 41, 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094318
Paasche-Orlow, M. K., & Wolf, M. S. (2007). The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. American journal of health behavior, 31 Suppl 1, S19–S26. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S19
Schulman-Green, D., Jaser, S. S., Park, C., & Whittemore, R. (2016). A metasynthesis of factors affecting self-management of chronic illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(7), 1469–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12902
Street, R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
This blog post is not sponsored by any organization or entitiy.
Subscribe for the latest posts from Dental Dive Bar.
Jessica is a clinically practicing Registered Dental Hygienist in the states of Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree from Pennsylvania College of Technology in 2023 and is currently pursuing a Master of Arts in Communications at Johns Hopkins University. With a focus on Health Communications and Applied Research in Communications, she is passionate about leveraging evidence-based communication practices to improve oral health outcomes and dental practice effectiveness.
Leave a Reply